Archive for the ‘Branding’ Category

50+ Years Later, Brand Basics Remain

Monday, June 21st, 2010

There’s an iconic B2B ad by McGraw-Hill Publishing from 1958 that’s been played and replayed over the years.  I first saw it in the ‘80s, and now it’s been reprinted in the current issue of B2B magazine.  It’s a fabulous photo of a grumpy businessman sitting in his office chair on a white background, glowering at the reader.  Here’s the copy:

“I don’t know who you are.

I don’t know your company.

I don’t know your company’s product.

I don’t know what your company stands for.

I don’t know your company’s customers.

I don’t know your company’s record.

I don’t know your company’s reputation.

Now—what was it you wanted to sell me?”

It’s a classic ad, as true in 1958 as it is today.  Yes, things have changed significantly, but it’s still important to build your brand, maintain your reputation and be memorable in the marketplace.  It’s still important to pre-sell your audience, regardless of the vehicle you use.  Of course, in 1958 there was only one practical vehicle, and hence the final line of copy in the ad:

MORAL:  Sales start before your salesman calls—with business magazine advertising.

Now sales start with web sites, e-mail campaigns, SEO (Search Engine Optimization) and so much more.  But the fundamental concepts haven’t changed a bit.

  • Share/Bookmark

When Your CEO Chokes on His Own Foot

Monday, June 14th, 2010

It’s been a few days since we’ve heard from BP’s Tony Hayward.  I envision his PR team struggling with rope and duct tape to bind and gag him in the boardroom, posting sentries at the door.  The man just kept spewing gaffes like, um, oil in the Gulf.

To recap a few of his most egregious utterings:

“What the hell did we do to deserve this?”

PR lesson #1:  It is not about you, Tony, or even your company.  It is about the 11 people who died, and the people whose livelihoods are destroyed, to say nothing of the environment.  How can a CEO be this tone deaf?  People’s lives are lost.  Keep priorities straight.

“The amount of volume of oil and dispersant we are putting into it [the Gulf] is tiny in relation to the total water volume.”

Are you trying to tell us this is not much of a problem, Tony?  If so, here’s PR lesson #2:  Tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth.  Do not attempt to downplay or understate the problem.  It just irks people deeply when you assume they are too dumb to know the biggest environmental disaster in history when they see it.

“I think the environmental impact of this disaster is likely to have been very, very modest.”

Tony, Tony, Tony.  See PR lesson #2.

And finally, the ever famous, “I’d like my life back.”

PR people everywhere are checking their records to see when they’ve last updated their CEO’s media training.  For years I tried to get one of my clients to develop a crisis communication program that included CEO training, but they always had other priorities.  And yes, I understand that.  It’s easy to put off and invest the money in more urgent initiatives that have obvious payback.

But if a disaster strikes, it’s too late for media training.  You’ll have to get out the duct tape.

  • Share/Bookmark

EMS Outsourcing and Trust

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010

Circuits Assembly recently had a couple blogs with some interesting topics:

1)  Nokia is outsourcing again after a year of pulling the work in-house.  This can only be good news for our business.

2)  Some opine that it’s best to manufacture electronic products in the region into which the product will be sold.

And what about outsourcing in the region in which electronic products will be manufactured?  Isn’t that a good idea?

With all the talk about globalization, do things just come down to the fact that people like to do business with their neighbor?  Is there some kind of comfort level we have when we deal with people in our own region?  Is there greater trust?

Because, in fact, trust is everything when you’re doing business.  Recently some financial and petroleum companies, among others, have seen trust in them erode.  It would be interesting to determine how lack of trust has affected their bottom lines on a case-by-case basis.  Because surely it has to some degree.  I’d like to see how much.

Then we could quantify the importance of trust and reputation.  And then we’d have an idea of the value of maintaining that reputation.  Which would make all of us in PR breathe easier.

  • Share/Bookmark

BP: Bummer Petroleum

Monday, May 10th, 2010

I suppose it was just a matter of time before the cheery BP ads with cute little icons representing alternative energy sources became a nightmare for BP PR people.  I know some of those folks because I was privileged to have BP as a client for quite a few years.  And, even though my heart bleeds for them, it bleeds much more for the people and the animals that suffer—and perhaps will suffer for years to come—as a result of the Gulf Coast disaster.

When you bill yourself as a super-duper environmentalist, you gotta make the rubber meet the road, so to speak.  A few years ago, I was pretty impressed with the company’s green commitment because the division I worked for did some serious R&D to mitigate the environmental impact of drilling for oil (in cold climates, though, not in Gulf waters).  But then BP sold off that division, and possibly their good intentions went with it.

Even when you are squeaky clean environmentally, you just know it’s dangerous to build your entire brand around it.  Drilling for oil is a risky business.  If you aren’t 150 percent certain that your multiple redundant safe guards will never ever let you down, then no.  Don’t beat your chest about how pro-environment you are.

Because there is no PR campaign in the universe good enough to save you if you really are not safe and environmentally sound.

  • Share/Bookmark

The Masters and Brand Mastery

Monday, April 12th, 2010

You can ask Accenture and other companies who bailed on Tiger Woods: When a person is also a brand in and of himself, and the brand is elevated to great heights by all who perceive him, there’s probably going to be a precipitous fall. And some marketers are bemoaning that consumer mistrust of this one brand is leaching to taint mistrust of many brands.

Maybe it’s true, but I would say most brands get what they deserve. Customers will be loyal to you if you give them ample reason to be. And they’ll stay loyal if you can sustain the reasons people trust you. No matter what size your company, it really comes down this:

Does your company have integrity?

So much easier said than done. Some would argue a big consumer goods company has a tougher time maintaining integrity by virtue of its size alone. But I would say it’s not a cakewalk for B2B companies either.

We B2B manufacturing firms have more different types of employees interacting directly with customers than most: ordering, shipping, accounts receivable, sales and more, depending on the type of product or service you offer. Every one of these people has to live up to the brand promise in every single transaction we make. Nearly impossible.

The point is, brand loyalty is very personal. And people aren’t perfect. Trust takes a long time to build and just seconds to shatter.

Take Tiger Woods, the most current, obvious example of a fallen brand. No matter how somber and sincere he looks in the new Nike black and white ad with a voice-over of his deceased father (ultra creepy, I think), Tiger has broken his brand promise. He is not yet to be trusted, although maybe he can build it back over time.

And yesterday, when Phil Michelson won the green jacket and tearfully hugged his wife (who has breast cancer) and their children, well, pass the tissues. The contrast between Phil and Tiger, who came in fourth, could not be greater. It’s all about honor, character, keeping your promises—for individuals and for companies too.

  • Share/Bookmark

Toyota: Crisis Communications or Catastrophe?

Monday, March 8th, 2010

Over the years I’ve counseled my clients to have crisis communication plans, up-to-date and ready at all times, just in case. Central to those plans is a process for identifying the problem, and telling the truth about it—the whole truth, and quickly. But what do you do when the truth will not set you free but will instead send you into a free-fall of catastrophic proportions?

The truth about Toyota is not good. Seems the problems they have are systemic. Seems they’ve been cutting corners all over the place. Seems, according to Fortune magazine, they have “a culture that prizes speed and efficiency over reliability and safety.”

There’s just no amount of PR that can change those fundamentals. Not until the core problems are thoroughly examined and totally corrected. When the problems are ingrained in the culture, like Toyota’s, that could take some time. Usually, in a crisis situation, you can find a reason things went wrong and fix it. There have been some online comparisons of Toyota to the classic crisis situation of Tylenol in the early ‘80s. But Toyota wishes they could have it so good.

Tylenol was a victim—they were sabotaged with poison. Toyota sabotaged themselves by abandoning what their brand had represented for years—quality. Tylenol had an expensive but relatively easy fix—recall the product and design those irritating but safe tamper-proof caps. (I’m sure this didn’t seem easy to Tylenol at the time, but they came out with the new bottles pretty quickly.) How long will it take to change Toyota’s entire way of doing things?

And here’s one more reason Toyota’s situation is very different from Tylenol’s. The Tylenol crisis didn’t happen in the age of the Internet. There were no legions of bloggers whipping up a froth of vitriol. There were no web sites popping up all over with URLs like ToyotaSucks.com. There was no Jon Stewart doing a six-minute segment entitled “The Toyotathon of Death” that’s played repeatedly on YouTube.

As a veteran PR person, I would like to say that PR can do its job to get Toyota out of this mess.  And certainly PR can help.  But slapping on a band-aid when you really need major surgery will only make the patient sicker in the long run. Yes, Toyota is Tweeting. Yes, the company is offering whiz-bang incentives to get customers’ confidence back. Yes, the company is doing some public groveling.

But no amount of PR will change the fact that Toyota can’t be trusted right now. The company played fast and loose (pun intended) with our safety for the sake of profit. And all the Tweets in the world won’t restore its reputation until it makes some fundamental changes. And even then, the climb back will be tough. Maybe impossible.

The headline in a recent morning’s paper makes me doubt Toyota’s future: Fixed Toyotas Still Accelerating. That’s not a crisis. That’s a catastrophe.


  • Share/Bookmark

B2B Brands, Take a Lesson from China

Monday, February 1st, 2010

I have been following the Google China news with fascination.  There are really a number of significant aspects to the story, but I’ll focus on one for now. That is the concept of control.

Think of China as a brand.  Think of Google as a medium for disseminating information, and all its customers in China as stakeholders.  This shouldn’t be hard, as I am stating the obvious.

The point is, China is trying to control what its customers (the Chinese people) see through the media.  They have demanded that Google comply with their censorship rules (something I believe Google agreed to, somewhat reluctantly, as the cost of breaking into the huge and promising market in China).  Worse, and the source of the latest flap, China employed very sophisticated technology to hack into Google e-mails in an attempt to thwart content they deemed subversive or pornographic.

Google, recovering some integrity, (remember, they agreed to censorship) threatened to pull out of the country.  But the customers, the Chinese people, desperately want Google to remain, to the point where they are laying flowers on the Google sign outside the company’s headquarters in Beijing.  Poignant, really.

What’s the lesson for EMS companies and other B2B brands?  You cannot, repeat, cannot, control what your stakeholders see or hear any more even if you don’t like what it is.  The Internet, social media, instantaneous news and our way of life in the 21st century simply preclude the concept of control.  China is like brands of yore, sending out carefully crafted messages to the marketplace through tightly controlled channels.

That kind of marketing is now really over.  We must recognize and embrace the messages our customers are sending us.  We must engage in the conversation.

If people are going to blog unhappy things about your brand, learn from it.  But don’t try to stop it.  Because surely it’s a losing battle, even for a powerhouse like China, to try and keep the lid on any longer.I have been following the Google China news with fascination.  There are really a number of significant aspects to the story, but I’ll focus on one for now. That is the concept of control.

Think of China as a brand.  Think of Google as a medium for disseminating information, and all its customers in China as stakeholders.  This shouldn’t be hard, as I am stating the obvious.

The point is, China is trying to control what its customers (the Chinese people) see through the media.  They have demanded that Google comply with their censorship rules (something I believe Google agreed to, somewhat reluctantly, as the cost of breaking into the huge and promising market in China).  Worse, and the source of the latest flap, China employed very sophisticated technology to hack into Google e-mails in an attempt to thwart content they deemed subversive or pornographic.

Google, recovering some integrity, (remember, they agreed to censorship) threatened to pull out of the country.  But the customers, the Chinese people, desperately want Google to remain, to the point where they are laying flowers on the Google sign outside the company’s headquarters in Beijing.  Poignant, really.

What’s the lesson for B2B brands?  You cannot, repeat, cannot, control what your stakeholders see or hear any more even if you don’t like what it is.  The Internet, social media, instantaneous news and our way of life in the 21st century simply preclude the concept of control.  China is like brands of yore, sending out carefully crafted messages to the marketplace through tightly controlled channels.

That kind of marketing is now really over.  We must recognize and embrace the messages our customers are sending us.  We must engage in the conversation.

If people are going to blog unhappy things about your brand, learn from it.  But don’t try to stop it.  Because surely it’s a losing battle, even for a powerhouse like China, to try and keep the lid on any longer.

  • Share/Bookmark